[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bpfk-announce] Re: gadri Update; Please Respond! Pretty please.
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 01:16:21AM -0400, Bob LeChevalier wrote:
> At 04:07 PM 7/3/04 -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> >I propose that we add the following two sections to the gadri
> > * Grammatical Pro-sumti KOhA7 KOhA8
> > * Subordinators NOI GEhU KUhO VUhO GOI ZIhE
> >I'm willing to shepherd one or both, but I would of course love it if
> >someone else wants to do it. In particular, I'm not entirely certain
> >of the sufficiency of my understanding of ce'u.
> >Having added these in, I further propose that we give it another
> >month, and if we haven't acheived something that looks like
> >consensus, we move on to something else.
> >Please tell me what you think of this plan, because I could really
> >use some feedback right now.
> Approve greatly.
> Keep pushing along pieces of the whole, without insisting on anything
> that suggests we are making a final decision, especially when it is
> understood that something is changing, until we have everything done
> to the same level, and I won't complain (as much %^).
I'll keep that in mind. :-)
> We don't really need consensus on anything at this stage to move on,
> we need lots of chunks defined so that people can mull over them for a
> This is an approach that comes closer to what I am looking for than
> the status quo. Spend a couple weeks on each topic and move on to the
> next whether we have consensus or not. Consensus will eventually
> develop without being pushed, if it can develop.
I need to balance that with people's need to feel accomplishment, but
I'll see what I can do.
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"