[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[dracyselkei] Re: Let's try this again.
I only reply here to things I have a useful reply to.
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 02:40:59PM -0700, Theodore Reed wrote:
> On 9/21/07, Robin Lee Powell <email@example.com> wrote:
> > First of all, my default here is the basic D&D universe (3rd ed
> > specifically) because "everybody knows that". Except, of
> > course, that some people here *don't*. If we can't come up with
> > something satisfying, though, we'll do that.
> "Basic D&D Universe"? I'm unaware of a basic setting.
The stuff presented in the player's handbok. From WP:
The current D&D "Core Setting" is largely based on Greyhawk, and
the default pantheon of deities for D&D is largely taken from
Greyhawk. The current edition of the Dungeon Master's Guide (3.5
edition) pays visual tribute to Greyhawk's influence on the
game, featuring on its cover a small map of the continent of
Oerik etched onto a globe.
> > Arda (Tolkien's universe; bit underpowered for my taste unless
> > y'all want to play maiar or something)
> I'm not sure Tolkein ever really specified much about how magic
> works for this to be feasible.
I can wave my hands *real good*! :)
> > Amber Chronicles universe (Zelazny) (my main reluctance here has
> > to do with not knowing if I can pull off courtly intrigue)
> I'm not sure you'd have to pull it off. That'd mostly be up to the
> players. The other thing to consider is the amount of "behind the
> other players' backs" RPing that would have to go on.
Yes, well, I wanted a small group (1-3) anyways. :)