Mail Index
Thread Index
[
First Page
][
Prev Page
][
Next Page
][
Last Page
]
RE: [jboske] factivity of nu
From
: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
RE: [jboske] Lojbab on tu'o (was: RE: RE: Nick on propositionalism &c
From
: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
Re: [jboske] Transfinites
From
: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
RE: [jboske] factivity of nu
From
: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
RE: [jboske] Aristotelian vs. modern logic
From
: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
RE: [jboske] Transfinites
From
: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
RE: [jboske] Kludgesome Solution #1
From
: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
RE: [jboske] Ontology #3
From
: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
RE: [jboske] Transfinites
From
: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
RE: [jboske] Aristotelian vs. modern logic
From
: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
Re: [jboske] Emergence solved
From
: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
RE: [jboske] factivity of nu
From
: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
Heh
From
: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
Oops
From
: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
RE: [jboske] Lojbab on tu'o (was: RE: RE: Nick on propositionalism &c
From
: Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
RE: [jboske] Lojbab on tu'o (was: RE: RE: Nick on propositionalism &c
From
: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
Re: [jboske] Heh
From
: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
Well, might as well burn the bridge now
From
: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
Re: [jboske] Aristotelian vs. modern logic
From
: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
RE: [jboske] Transfinites
From
: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
RE: Subject:? RE: [jboske] Transfinites
From
: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
The Dead shall Walk Again (was: Aristotelian vs. modern logic)
From
: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
Substance vs Bit of Substance
From
: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
Re: [jboske] Emergence solved
From
: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
Re: [jboske] Substance vs Bit of Substance
From
: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
Re: [jboske] Transfinites
From
: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
Re: Substance vs Bit of Substance
From
: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
Re: Emergence solved
From
: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
Re: [jboske] Transfinites
From
: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
The mess, the despair, and the Lojban Academy
From
: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
XS 4.1: the gist
From
: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
RE: [jboske] Lojbab on tu'o (was: RE: RE: Nick on propositionalism &c
From
: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
RE: [jboske] Lojbab on tu'o (was: RE: RE: Nick on propositionalism&c
From
: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
RE: [jboske] Emergence solved
From
: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
RE: [jboske] po'o
From
: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
RE: [jboske] ExSol ver 4.0
From
: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
RE: [jboske] XS 4.1: the gist
From
: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
RE: [jboske] The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: Digest Number 134))
From
: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
RE: [jboske] The Dead shall Walk Again (was: Aristotelian vs. modern logic)
From
: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
RE: [jboske] Substance vs Bit of Substance
From
: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
RE: [jboske] Re: Substance vs Bit of Substance
From
: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
RE: [jboske] Transfinites
From
: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
ellipsis (was: RE: The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: Digest Number 134))
From
: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
RE: [jboske] The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism&c. (was: Digest Number 134))
From
: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
RE: [jboske] The un-common-sensical-ness of non-importing ro
From
: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
Counting Nick
From
: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
KS1.1: piro
From
: "Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>" <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
Link on (Intensional) Masses
From
: "Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>" <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
Re: Counting Nick
From
: "Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>" <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
Re: Transfinites
From
: "Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>" <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
RE: What is a lojbanmass? Quantification
From
: "Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>" <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
RE: What is a lojbanmass? Quantification
From
: "Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>" <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
Re: OT: verification principle (was Re: [jboske] factivity of nu)
From
: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
Re: [jboske] Well, might as well burn the bridge now
From
: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
RE: [jboske] Lojbab on tu'o (was: RE: RE: Nick on propositionalism &c
From
: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
RE: [jboske] The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism &c. (was: Digest Number 134))
From
: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
RE: [jboske] Link on (Intensional) Masses
From
: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
RE: [jboske] Re: Counting Nick
From
: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
Re: Link on (Intensional) Masses
From
: "Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>" <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
Re: Counting Nick
From
: "Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>" <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
Link on (Intensional) Masses
From
: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
KS 1.1: piro
From
: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
KS 1.1: piro
From
: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
Apologies for repeats just then.
From
: "Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>" <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
Re: [jboske] lo/le definition
From
: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Re: [jboske] Aristotelian vs. modern logic
From
: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Re: [jboske] factivity of nu
From
: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Re: [jboske] factivity of nu
From
: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Re: [jboske] KS1.1: piro
From
: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
Re: OT: verification principle (was Re: [jboske] factivity of nu)
From
: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
Re: [jboske] factivity of nu
From
: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
Re: [jboske] KS1.1: piro
From
: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
Re: [jboske] Transfinites
From
: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
An Amateur note on Substance (was: Transfinites)
From
: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
Re: [jboske] Transfinites
From
: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
Re: [jboske] Lojban is fxxxed
From
: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Re: OT: verification principle (was Re: [jboske] factivity of nu)
From
: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Re: [jboske] factivity of nu
From
: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
Re: OT: verification principle (was Re: [jboske] factivity of nu)
From
: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
Re: [jboske] Lojban is fxxxed
From
: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
Re: [jboske] Transfinites
From
: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Re: [jboske] factivity of nu
From
: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Re: [jboske] Aristotelian vs. modern logic
From
: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Re: [jboske] Transfinites
From
: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
zi'o (was: Transfinites)
From
: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
Re: [jboske] zi'o (was: Transfinites)
From
: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Re: [jboske] Lojban is fxxxed
From
: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
Re: [jboske] zi'o (was: Transfinites)
From
: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
Re: [jboske] Lojban is fxxxed
From
: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
Re: [jboske] zi'o (was: Transfinites)
From
: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
RE: OT: verification principle (was Re: [jboske] factivity of nu)
From
: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
RE: [jboske] Lojbab on tu'o (was: RE: RE: Nick on propositionalism &c
From
: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
Re: [jboske] zi'o (was: Transfinites)
From
: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
Re: [jboske] The Dead shall Walk Again (was: Aristotelian vs. modern logic)
From
: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Re: [jboske] Re: Counting Nick
From
: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Re: [jboske] factivity of nu
From
: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Re: OT: verification principle (was Re: [jboske] factivity of nu)
From
: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Re: [jboske] Lojban is fxxxed
From
: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Re: OT: verification principle (was Re: [jboske] factivity of nu)
From
: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
Re: [jboske] factivity of nu
From
: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.6.3