[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [jboske] RE: sets, masses, &c.

On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, And Rosta wrote:

> #> 2. Why do we insist on understanding lV'i gadri to refer to pure sets
> #> rather than to groups/teams? What is to be gained from this?
> #
> #Do you mean "groups/teams" in distinction to "masses"?
> That's one of the issues we're discussing -- whether there is a
> difference. But my question 2 is independent of that issue, in
> asking Why must we insist that le'i prenu can't carry logs?

Because then they collapse into masses?

When a system is in harmony with the Tao,
the compiler makes applications and utilities.
When a system goes counter to the Tao,
accounting logs fill the root directory.