RE: [jboske] The two faces of tu'o (was: Nick on propositionalism&c. (was: Digest Number 134))

[Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>]

On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, And Rosta wrote:

> xod:
> > On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, And Rosta wrote:
> >
> > > So if there's no agent then it's not a catra relationship. It's
> > > a se catra be zi'o property. Take a relationship between an agent
> > > and an undergoer -- a dier
> >
> > A dier? Or a diar?
>
> I don't know whether this is a joke, but either way I don't understand.
> "Dier" = "one who dies", "moriturus".



I wonder if dier is speller diEr, or diAr like liar?



-- 
// if (!terrorist)
// ignore ();
// else
collect_data ();