[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

The compromise of uncomprehension

As is very clear, I just don't get what And, Jorge and xod clearly get. So I'll let them be able to say what they want (without getting it), and move on.

My solutions, having been conceived of in 3-D space, have assumed that all entities have at least 2 (and presumably transfinite bits); that atoms had a cardinality as the inner and a count as the outer; and that collectives had a cardinality of bits on the inner and a size on the outer.

There are abstractions that do not have parts in any sensible way. Like fondness.

These things are atoms, trivially (they don't contain, so nothing they contain is P(x).) These things are stuff, trivially: all none of what they contain is P(x). (Here's the perniciousness of the non-importing-ro, but whatever.)

So it's silly to fractionally quantify them: they have no bits to quantify over. And if there is any number of them, there is only one of them: their quantification is trivial.

I contend that for anything 3-D, there are always 3-D bits: it is the nature of 3-D space. But my colleagues want to consider the possibility of not considering the entity as having bits, but of thinking of it in the same way as fondness.

I think this is malrarbau codswallop, but Lojban has to be metaphysically parsimonious, and we've got to be able to speak of fondness anyway, so fine, they can have it.

I have my way, and speak of piro loi ci'ipa djacu
They have their way, and speak of tu'o loi tu'o djacu (there are no bits --- here tu'o means 'no number', not just 'no prenex'), or pa lo pa djacu (which is tantamount to tu'o [un-prenexed] lo pa djacu, but restricted to this world --- so, pa lo pa djacu-in-this-world, or pa lo pa ca'a djacu.)

Does this work?

yISotQo', jupwI'. yIQuch... Dr Nick Nicholas, French/Italian,
chaq DuQuchmoHlaHbej yuch. University of Melbourne,
Don't be distressed, my friend. Be happy... Australia.
Perhaps chocolate can cheer you up. nickn@unimelb.edu.au
-- David Barron, Klingon Opera _Kang_. http://www.opoudjis.net