[jbovlaste] Re: Re: No Catch

[Yanis Batura <ybatura@mail.ru>]

> You ask if it's "possible" to construct a "proper" lujvo for "catch".  
> 1) I think that it's certainly possible to construct such a lujvo.  The lujvo 
> may not be very good, but it's still possible.
> 2) What's a "proper" lujvo?  Well-formed?  Easily guessed?  Both?  
> 3) What meaning(s) of "catch" do you want the lujvo to mean?  How do you 
> discriminate between different lujvo for the sense you want?  Does catching a fish 
> use the same word as catching a ball thrown to you?  Does a dog catch a 
> Frisbee with the same word that I catch a Frisbee with?  How is the catching 
> performed?  What is caught?  Using the word "catch" leaves a lot of leeway.  (In 
> fact, "kavbu" captures some, but not all, of the senses of 'catch'.)

You're right, I had to specify my question more _properly_ :)