[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: number of alternatives?
- To: lojban-lbck@googlegroups.com
- Subject: Re: number of alternatives?
- From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 18:46:41 -0300
- Authentication-results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.171 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
- Delivered-to: phma@localhost
- Delivered-to: phma@phma.optus.nu
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:x-sender:x-apparently-to :received:received:received:received-spf:received:dkim-signature :domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:reply-to:sender :precedence:x-google-loop:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-unsubscribe:x-beenthere-env:x-beenthere; bh=n5jixTBz4/v0Q2fdRNAcVg7K/qzDIMh/H0b5jwCi0Bc=; b=Av6fx6+7n402TRqB4ANiM+pkZfH7NNl31WH1JuN7W95QSUxQ69gzd1CpqbAdFoYYMW yW9sQsM9ZF3G/Z8UeqNaAHqeRp46U+wzVFXtbIfIyGhqAlqazhx7h2NtMwTgU9Ys/+xD gb83krmYGBVjqn5/Dv6NLlk9b4nYl4uXC5jtE=
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=oFt6Wj3g5fMv+88CuNBJZYPs6VKK64wa935xgNMBPPw=; b=t/4TSxlrlCfJI6gO2Ub9vCQEFnvHY3fBervmzCzRrz2TueaNCVz+6S5SPHNSeCVKEd 2BPTy2UItmax7YeUCKEjg0mekpN5D2WbmWe2Vm1w5XVnHJurc9WaePIVB/V9sHRdOQEW 7kTEitqm6IJoTfRSE1Zvj+EBcA3A6jrUC+8KY=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-sender:x-apparently-to:received-spf:authentication-results :dkim-signature:domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:reply-to :sender:precedence:x-google-loop:mailing-list:list-id:list-post :list-help:list-unsubscribe:x-beenthere-env:x-beenthere; b=udL1d+lUH6kIF2DN4rhD0FrZJerqxR73d5QgdrJhX28aa8oihHvS0HyuKN0fiEZUIG 39huhk7SiCgf30yi5tNhFMkI3sVQFVEpQDVK9xlByzWwKAq/VUIMNfdXNLMZsoRI9c82 Wwv2Nrf/KcOjUTnXwjryI71TXwd06WJ5yzNXk=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Qe6pENxsXLP07n3QvKs79ZlzWoNQC44n7OprVogfAZT0CsAHXKIgOSYYqdI/U6Eau2 65NJEzUtRaxAe/2dUP9+yx+zt4WuVVImi/b3nwQwFOySkjskOVAwRjEjnPoXNdDZKFNh FHMJUnu/foa2O4PbbeNSGRp0Abda/Vfpa5EhU=
- In-reply-to: <200909091626.12318.phma@phma.optus.nu>
- List-help: <mailto:lojban-lbck+help@googlegroups.com>
- List-id: <lojban-lbck.googlegroups.com>
- List-post: <mailto:lojban-lbck@googlegroups.com>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://googlegroups.com/group/lojban-lbck/subscribe>, <mailto:lojban-lbck+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
- Mailing-list: list lojban-lbck@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-lbck+owner@googlegroups.com
- References: <200909090027.38831.phma@phma.optus.nu> <925d17560909090823l2e6a698fw53c97206ac7b20e4@mail.gmail.com> <200909091626.12318.phma@phma.optus.nu>
- Reply-to: lojban-lbck@googlegroups.com
- Sender: lojban-lbck@googlegroups.com
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
>
> 1. cnoblo
> 2. conlo'i
> 3. coiblo
> A. ro di'u dunsi'u
> B. le pamoi cu frica le remoi .e le cimoi
> C. le remoi cu frica le cimoi .e le pamoi
> D. le cimoi cu frica le pamoi .e le remoi
> E. ro di'u ficysi'u
("ro di'u" should be "lo ro di'u" or "lo'i ro di'u", otherwise you get
"each of them".)
Without knowing any of the rafsi, we know that if they were all
different, B, C, D and E would all be true, therefore they can't all
be different, therefore we can eliminate E. I think you need to change
"frica" to "dunli" and ".e" to ".enai" in B, C, D.
> I think that questions should be organized into sections, so that instructions
> can be given once per section. So we have:
[...]
> You pick at random a subset of the question groups whose numbers of questions
> add up to the section's number of questions, then pick at random questions
> from each section group.
Sounds good.
Is there some convenient way of storing the database online someplace
so that authorized people can add questions to the base and then
reviewers can revise them, add comments, etc, before the question gets
approved for testing? Also, each question should have some indication
of which level test it is for, which could be revised in case the
question turns out to be too easy or too difficult for that level.
mu'o mi'e xorxes