Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Get Much Ca$h !

From: "Jorge Llambias" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 22:39:54 GMT

>I thought that go'e
>repeated an entire 'sentence', but you seem to be saying that it only
>repeats the selbri.

It repeats the selbri. You can't put {le} in front of an entire sentence. 
{go'e} is a brivla.

Of course, a single selbri can be an entire sentence, and when
you use {go'e} by itself as a sentence, the arguments are by
default the same arguments as used with the precedent selbri,
but that's another matter.

>Or are you just using 'le rorci' to refer to the
>whole sentence?

No, {le go'e} is {le rorci}, the x1 of go'e, in this case
the x1 of rorci.

What was meant was {le du'u go'e}, or just {di'u} or {de'u}
or something like that.

co'o mi'e xorxes

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
http://profiles.msn.com.