Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Problematic entries in the lujvo list

From: "Jorge Llambias" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2000 19:22:25

la aulun cusku di'e

>x1 cu banli le ka jamna -> balkamjamna -> baljamna -> "grand in warring" 
>("gloriously warring")

(At the risk of being chastised for invoking non-existing
lujvo making rules...)

I just can't see {banli le ka jamna} giving {balkamjamna}.
It has to be {kamjamba'i} or simply {jamba'i}.

That is not to say that {baljamna} is not a valid lujvo,
but its expansion (to me) would be something like
{banli je jamna}, not {banli le ka jamna}.

co'o mi'e xorxes

_____________________________________________________________________________________
Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com