Subject: Two more type IV fu'ivla questions

From: Richard Curnow <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 22:11:46 +0000

1. In the online version of the Ref. Grammar there is a statement

It is possible to have fu'ivla like ``spa'i'' that are five letters
long,

yet doesn't spa'i fail the slinku'i test, because (for example) baspa'i
would be a valid lujvo (I leave the meaning to the reader's imagination
:-) ) So is the first statement wrong?

2. Does Lojban make any use at all of CCV as a word on its own (e.g.
spa)?

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard P. Curnow [email-masked]
Weston-super-Mare
United Kingdom http://go.to/richard.curnow/