Le mardi 21 novembre 2017 22:10:24 UTC+1, Gregorio
Guidi a écrit :
On
11/21/2017 03:08 PM, suke...@gmail.com wrote:
> ***
>
> @all:
> Now about submissions to update the CLL... Let's imagine
a second we
> have an unique and active board (say "LLGBPFKCoders", or
whatever),
> and adequate tools. What would be an efficient submission
protocol?
> Here are two drafts:
>
> [...]
>
> That's even simpler, but removes the ability to make tiny
changes once
> validated. What's your opinion?
>
The community should be able to send pull requests with
proposed changes
to the CLL. The LLG, as owner of the CLL, should appoint a
recognized
member of the community as release manager in charge of the
official
repository, with the power to accept/reject patches, set a
roadmap and
make releases (CLL 1.2, 1.3, 2.0, ...).
Just my 2 cents.
mi'e la .greg.
What I feel interesting is centralizing stuff within the
LLG, which is the logical (historical?) choice I guess. And
the "release manager" is something surely interesting too.
I find it inevitable since the CLL is "their" book, strictly
speaking.
But I fear this proposal would turn into another
dead-end. We may end with someone inactive, or which blocks
anything, as currently.
Indeed, that is possible. My reasoning is that if it comes to that,
then there is nothing left to be saved anyway. The only possibility
in this case would be to have an independent fork gain enough
momentum and community support to replace the LLG version in
authoritativeness, but I find this scenario extremely unlikely.
I'm thinking about giving more decisions to the community,
but as Gleki pointed out, most may just be unable to make a
choice. I will integrate your ideas in my text proposal.
Thanks.
Thanks for all your efforts!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
|