Re: [lojban] Re: CLL and modern Lojban

[Remo Dentato <rdentato@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 5:19 AM, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:

2017-11-21 22:25 GMT+03:00 Remo Dentato <rdentato@gmail.com>:

On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Gleki Arxokuna <gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com> wrote:

Just note that PEG doesn't "resolve" parsing ambiguity in a common sense of this verb.

Not sure what you mean here, Gleki.

Given a PEG there can be only one parse tree for a string and this is what matters most.

Yes, and it does NOT resolve ambiguity.

 

Sorry Glecki but I still don't understand which ambiguity you are referring to, can you make an example?

 

People instead of doing work themselves like to authorize SomeoneElse to do it.

I agree and that's why I never stepped into this area (even if I'm guilty myself to have written a PEG parser for my own use :) )

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lojban+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lojban@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/lojban.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.