From araizen@newmail.net Fri Aug 31 08:08:07 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: araizen@newmail.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2); 31 Aug 2001 15:08:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 53290 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2001 15:05:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 31 Aug 2001 15:05:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO out.newmail.net) (212.150.54.158) by mta1 with SMTP; 31 Aug 2001 15:05:12 -0000 Received: from oemcomputer ([62.0.180.216]) by out.newmail.net ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 18:06:12 +0200 Message-ID: <032c01c13236$dfaa7e80$8ab5003e@oemcomputer> To: References: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Induction Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 17:03:35 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 From: "Adam Raizen" la .nitcion. cusku di'e > induction is sucta. deduction and abduction are both tolsucta. deduction is > the logical reverse of abduction. We still don't have a way to say "conclude", whether by induction, deduction, or abduction (i.e. the bridi equivalent of "ja'o"). Unless perhaps this is "jinvi". mu'o mi'e .adam.