From araizen@newmail.net Wed Sep 26 05:54:26 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: araizen@newmail.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_3_2_2); 26 Sep 2001 12:53:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 58954 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2001 12:53:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by 10.1.1.223 with QMQP; 26 Sep 2001 12:53:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailgw2.netvision.net.il) (194.90.1.9) by mta1 with SMTP; 26 Sep 2001 12:54:24 -0000 Received: from oemcomputer (ras2-p115.rvt.netvision.net.il [62.0.180.244]) by mailgw2.netvision.net.il (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA04355 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 14:54:22 +0200 (IST) Message-ID: <03d101c1468a$8538ae00$d8b5003e@oemcomputer> To: "lojban list" References: <002701c14651$04729d00$d120ca3e@oemcomputer> Subject: Re: [lojban] le broda be brode be'o Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 14:55:10 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 From: "Adam Raizen" la greg. cusku di'e > does the grammatical construct {le broda be brode be'o ku} mean anything? No, it is not grammatical. After 'be' and 'bei' there must be a term (a sumti or a tagged sumti). mu'o mi'e .adam.