From araizen@newmail.net Sat Oct 27 17:17:57 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: araizen@newmail.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_0_1); 28 Oct 2001 00:17:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 19662 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2001 00:17:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 28 Oct 2001 00:17:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO out.newmail.net) (212.150.54.158) by mta2 with SMTP; 28 Oct 2001 00:17:53 -0000 Received: from default ([62.0.180.245]) by out.newmail.net ; Sun, 28 Oct 2001 02:18:15 +0200 Message-ID: <00ef01c15fac$0748a6e0$dab5003e@default> To: References: <0110271227530F.01291@neofelis> <20011027162600.A643@twcny.rr.com> Subject: Re: [lojban] a construal of lo'e & le'e Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 12:28:19 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 From: "Adam Raizen" X-Yahoo-Profile: araizen la rab.spir. cusku di'e > I think the misuse of {da} to mean "something", without considering the > logical implications, is much more dangerous than using the wrong > article. I'd say about half the time someone says {da} they really mean > {zu'i}. "zu'i" implies "da", doesn't it? mu'o mi'e .adam.