From mark@xxx.xxx Sun Aug 22 09:59:32 1999
X-Digest-Num: 218
Message-ID: <44114.218.1174.959273825@eGroups.com>
Date: 22 Aug 1999 16:59:32 -0000
From: mark@xxx.xxx
Subject: Re: Lojban analogies and kennings

>From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
>Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1999 09:57:50 PDT
>
>From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
>
>In my last mail in reponse to Mark I wanted to express
>the relationship ja'ai:ja'a::nai:na, where ja'ai is the
>new cmavo Mark was proposing. I wrote:
>
> zo ja'ai joi zo ja'a zo nai joi zo na mintu le ka ckini simxu
> "ja'ai"&"ja'a" are the same as "nai"&"na" in the relationship
> between them.
>

I had read an extra {joi} someplace and thought you'd put them all into one
biiig mass, but I understood it anyway. Actually, I'd hoped you would use
something clever with {ce'o} and {pi'u} and/or a termset or something. I
thought of suggesting it, but realized I couldn't pull it off right either
(I need to read up on termsets again).

~mark

Hmm, is there still an IRC #lojban?