From lojbanlists@wonderclown.com Wed Jan 09 17:10:51 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: randy@wonderclown.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_1_3); 10 Jan 2002 01:10:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 12723 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2002 01:10:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.167) by m11.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 Jan 2002 01:10:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail8.nc.rr.com) (24.93.67.55) by mta1.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Jan 2002 01:10:50 -0000 Received: from aerosol ([66.57.85.38]) by mail8.nc.rr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.687.68); Wed, 9 Jan 2002 20:10:49 -0500 Received: from rnortman by aerosol with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16OTk1-0002rJ-00 for ; Wed, 09 Jan 2002 20:10:49 -0500 Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 20:10:49 -0500 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Relative Clauses and Connectives Message-ID: <20020110011048.GA10286@aerosol> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i Sender: Randall Nortman Return-Path: randy@wonderclown.com From: "randl. nortmn." X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=91794573 X-Yahoo-Profile: uyndrklaun Consider the following structure: ko'a .e ko'e noi broda In this case, it seems that "noi broda" attaches only to "ko'e", not to both "ko'a" and "ko'e". How might one introduce a relative clause meant to be attached to both? Is it even possible? mu'omi'e randl.