From phma@webjockey.net Wed Jan 09 17:18:20 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_1_3); 10 Jan 2002 01:18:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 93123 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2002 01:18:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (216.115.97.171) by m8.grp.snv.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 Jan 2002 01:18:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (208.150.110.21) by mta3.grp.snv.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Jan 2002 01:18:19 -0000 Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500) id D13E63C5C3; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 20:18:17 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Relative Clauses and Connectives Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 20:18:16 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <20020110011048.GA10286@aerosol> In-Reply-To: <20020110011048.GA10286@aerosol> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0201092018160C.10006@neofelis> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com From: Pierre Abbat Reply-To: phma@webjockey.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=92712300 On Wednesday 09 January 2002 20:10, randl. nortmn. wrote: > Consider the following structure: > > ko'a .e ko'e noi broda > > In this case, it seems that "noi broda" attaches only to "ko'e", not > to both "ko'a" and "ko'e". How might one introduce a relative clause > meant to be attached to both? Is it even possible? ko'a .e ko'e vu'o noi broda. mu'omi'e pier.