From jorge@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xxx Fri Jan 8 03:23:58 1999 X-Digest-Num: 40 Message-ID: <44114.40.142.959273824@eGroups.com> Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1999 08:23:58 -0300 From: "=?us-ascii?Q?Jorge_J._Llamb=EDas?=" xrvatska itself would seem to be a valid type 4 fu'ivla - I don't see any >obvious way that the beginning consonat cluster could break up. It is not valid because xrv- is not a permissible initial consonant cluster. It would absorb any immediately preceding cmavo to form a different fu'ivla. (Probably a type 3, as in {la xrvatska} -> lax-r-vatska.) co'o mi'e xorxes