From rizen@ispwest.com Tue May 14 22:52:00 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: rizen@ispwest.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_3_2); 15 May 2002 05:52:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 46136 invoked from network); 15 May 2002 05:51:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 15 May 2002 05:51:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ispwestemail.aceweb.net) (66.12.114.252) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 May 2002 05:51:59 -0000 Received: from there (unverified [63.93.79.15]) by ispwestemail.aceweb.net (Vircom SMTPRS 1.3.227) with SMTP id for ; Tue, 14 May 2002 22:47:12 -0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] zgamuvjga Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 22:50:08 -0700 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] References: <02051501201300.02013@neofelis> In-Reply-To: <02051501201300.02013@neofelis> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Ted Reed X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=104181342 X-Yahoo-Profile: xrizen On Tuesday 14 May 2002 22:20, you wrote: > I made this word up for "parallax" with the following place structure: > x1 is the parallax of x2 as seen by x3 who moves to x4 from x5 > Someone proposed the following place structure, if I understand the comment > right: > x1 is the parallax of x2 as seen by x3 who moves along path x4 > Which is better? > > phma I think knowing the whole path is more important than just the starting and ending points. -- bancus