From jcowan@reutershealth.com Mon Aug 12 09:23:02 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: jcowan@reutershealth.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_0_7_4); 12 Aug 2002 16:23:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 1776 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2002 16:23:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m9.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 12 Aug 2002 16:23:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail2.reutershealth.com) (65.246.141.151) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Aug 2002 16:23:01 -0000 Received: from skunk.reutershealth.com (IDENT:cowan@[10.65.117.21]) by mail2.reutershealth.com (Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA24012; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 12:33:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200208121633.MAA24012@mail2.reutershealth.com> Received: by skunk.reutershealth.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 12 Aug 2002 12:20:19 -0400 Subject: Re: [lojban] fu'ivla with lujvo as rafsi? To: jjllambias@hotmail.com (Jorge Llambias) Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 12:20:19 -0400 (EDT) Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com, Philip.Newton@datenrevision.de In-Reply-To: from "Jorge Llambias" at Aug 12, 2002 04:06:52 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: John Cowan X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=8122456 X-Yahoo-Profile: john_w_cowan Jorge Llambias scripsit: > I think {cesprenrapostolo} breaks as {ce sprenrapostolo}, > because "spr" is a valid initial cluster. (I'm not 100% > sure this is the rule though.) It is. That's why the glue letter has to be r, n, or l, because none of those can begin a valid initial cluster. -- John Cowan jcowan@reutershealth.com www.reutershealth.com www.ccil.org/~cowan Promises become binding when there is a meeting of the minds and consideration is exchanged. So it was at King's Bench in common law England; so it was under the common law in the American colonies; so it was through more than two centuries of jurisprudence in this country; and so it is today. Assent may be registered by a signature, a handshake, or a click of a computer mouse transmitted across the invisible ether of the Internet. Formality is not a requisite; any sign, symbol or action, or even willful inaction, as long as it is unequivocally referable to the promise, may create a contract. --_Specht v. Netscape_