From xod@bway.net Sun Oct 31 22:51:32 1999 X-Digest-Num: 272 Message-ID: <44114.272.1520.959273825@eGroups.com> Date: Mon, 1 Nov 1999 01:51:32 -0500 From: xod Subject: Re: 3 dogs, 2 men, many arguments At 2:47 PM -0800 10/31/99, Jorge Llambias wrote: >From: "Jorge Llambias" >What you are arguing is that they both should mean >"de ro da zo'u da broda de". In other words, you >want that when the variables are not explicitly >quatified in the prenex, their quantification >should be existentials first, universals second. That's not quite what I am suggesting. Let me know if the post I sent a few minutes prior to this isn't clear enough. >What you call mapping, at least in some cases, is the >job of the quantifier. The quantifier is not a part >of the set definition. Isn't it? What if I say "let set A include all the dogs that bark at night", or "let set B be 3 fast cars". ----- During the initial period after Falon is installed, you may feel a little unused to it being in your body, you may have abdominal pain, or feel like something is moving and have the sense of warmth, etc. http://www.uidaho.edu/student_orgs/falun/eng/flg_5.htm#e1