From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Sep 10 17:27:53 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_0_1); 11 Sep 2002 00:27:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 8036 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2002 00:27:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 11 Sep 2002 00:27:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Sep 2002 00:27:53 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17ovMH-0000FG-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 17:27:53 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17ovME-0000Ey-00; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 17:27:50 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 10 Sep 2002 17:27:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17ovM7-0000Ep-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 17:27:43 -0700 Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g8B0X0wD001202 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 19:33:01 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com) Received: (from fracture@localhost) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g8B0X0UB001201 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2002 19:33:00 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 19:33:00 -0500 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: word for "www" (was: Archive location.) Message-ID: <20020911003300.GA931@allusion.net> References: <20020910182959.GF6798@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20020910220714.GZ6798@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020910220714.GZ6798@chain.digitalkingdom.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-archive-position: 1076 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong From: Jordan DeLong Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out --CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 03:07:14PM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 11:00:03PM +0100, And Rosta wrote: > > Robin CA: > > > The whole *point* of lujvo, unless I'm missing something, is that > > > someone should be able to dissect them and figure out what you mean. > >=20 > > Not so. Lujvo are simply a means of creating new words for new > > meanings. However, other things being equal (e.g. word length), > > a candidate lujvo is held to be the more superior the more its > > meaning and place structure can be guessed from its constituent > > parts. >=20 > I can't tell if you're agreeing with me or not. 8) I agree with And. *ducks* --=20 Jordan DeLong fracture@allusion.net --CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9fo88DrrilS51AZ8RAqyUAJ0QA3jcrWBJhCV9b7kVckBB4kBVXgCfX0Bu YeMG5XzIJmKEhkswAYPlBpg= =7RMv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK--