From lojban-out@lojban.org Sat Sep 28 16:45:48 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_1_1_4); 28 Sep 2002 23:45:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 56791 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2002 23:45:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 28 Sep 2002 23:45:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 Sep 2002 23:45:48 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17vRK8-0000fs-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 16:48:36 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17vRJM-0000fR-00; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 16:47:48 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 28 Sep 2002 16:47:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from manyas.bcc.bilkent.edu.tr ([139.179.30.24]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17vRJI-0000fI-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 16:47:44 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by manyas.bcc.bilkent.edu.tr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 513F812B77 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 02:44:52 +0300 (EEST) Received: from bilkent.edu.tr (ppp13.bcc.bilkent.edu.tr [139.179.111.15]) by manyas.bcc.bilkent.edu.tr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89D0212B36 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 02:44:49 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <3D966A45.80607@bilkent.edu.tr> Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 02:49:41 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020610 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, tr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: On what there isn't References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020300 X-archive-position: 1695 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: robin@bilkent.edu.tr Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: robin From: robin Reply-To: robin@bilkent.edu.tr X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out pycyn@aol.com wrote: > > > > Actually not. The difference is not crucial, however, for the > present issue. What is important is that {la} is a subclass of {le} > and so assumes that there is something to which the expression refers. > Put that way, it makes more sense. robin.tr -- "Mix a little foolishness with your serious plans. It's lovely to be silly at the right moment" - Horace Robin Turner IDMYO Bilkent Üniversitesi Ankara 06533 http://www.bilkent.edu.tr/~robin