From lojban-out@lojban.org Wed Oct 09 07:20:22 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_2_0); 9 Oct 2002 14:20:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 84633 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2002 14:20:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 9 Oct 2002 14:20:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 Oct 2002 14:20:21 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 17zHl4-0001cC-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 09 Oct 2002 07:24:18 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 17zHkM-0001bm-00; Wed, 09 Oct 2002 07:23:34 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 09 Oct 2002 07:23:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from miranda.org ([209.58.150.153] ident=qmailr) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 17zHkH-0001bV-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2002 07:23:29 -0700 Received: (qmail 13748 invoked by uid 534); 9 Oct 2002 14:19:30 -0000 Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 08:19:30 -0600 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: [Announcement] The Alice Translation Has Moved And Changed Message-ID: <20021009081930.A7788@miranda.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from arosta@uclan.ac.uk on Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 02:14:25PM +0100 X-archive-position: 2027 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jkominek@miranda.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Jay F Kominek From: Jay F Kominek Reply-To: jkominek@miranda.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 02:14:25PM +0100, And Rosta wrote: > Jay (to xorxes): > #> As an example: I use {li re ji'i ci} to translate "(approximately) > #> two or three". Pierre prefers {li re bi'i ci} for this, > # > #For good reason, that use of ji'i is in clear, _explicit_ violation > #of the way the CLL defines ji'i. (Which happens to be quite useful.) > > I've just taken a quick peek at the refgram, & it looks as though > "approximately 2 or 3" would be {ji'i re bi'i ci}. Ahh. > #More power to you, Pierre. > > In his cmavo preferences, I hope you mean, rather than in silently > editing xorxes's text. Well, going back and forth silently like that it sounds like they did is silly of the both of them. I'm not keen on CVS fights by any one. -- Jay Kominek Did you poison the coffee? Not any more than I usually do.