From arosta@uclan.ac.uk Thu Nov 14 05:31:52 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: arosta@uclan.ac.uk X-Apparently-To: Lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 14 Nov 2002 13:31:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 27724 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2002 13:31:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 14 Nov 2002 13:31:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO com1.uclan.ac.uk) (193.61.255.3) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Nov 2002 13:31:50 -0000 Received: from gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk by com1.uclan.ac.uk with SMTP (Mailer); Thu, 14 Nov 2002 12:57:23 +0000 Received: from DI1-Message_Server by gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk with Novell_GroupWise; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 13:31:09 +0000 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2 Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 13:30:34 +0000 To: Lojban Subject: Wiki summary of consensus about {ro} Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline From: And Rosta X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=810630 X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin The big debate about "importing ro" moved from this list to Jboske, where i= s was eventually resolved. The consensus is given on the wiki (in a text th= at the debate's participants approved): http://www.lojban.org/wiki/index.php/quantification%20and%20the%20meaning%2= 0of%20ro --And.