From lojban-out@lojban.org Wed Dec 04 15:19:17 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 4 Dec 2002 23:19:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 10091 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2002 23:19:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m7.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 4 Dec 2002 23:19:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 4 Dec 2002 23:19:15 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18JinT-0005lE-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 15:19:15 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18JinO-0005ko-00; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 15:19:10 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 04 Dec 2002 15:19:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp-server1.tampabay.rr.com ([65.32.1.34]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18JinH-0005kW-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 15:19:03 -0800 Received: from macsrule.com (85.78.33.65.cfl.rr.com [65.33.78.85]) by smtp-server1.tampabay.rr.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id gB4NJ2CB010171 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 18:19:02 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 18:19:17 -0500 Subject: [lojban] Re: Loglan Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v548) To: lojban-list@lojban.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis In-Reply-To: Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.548) X-archive-position: 3020 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rmcivor@macsrule.com Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Robert McIvor From: Robert McIvor Reply-To: rmcivor@macsrule.com X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out On Lundi, déce 2, 2002, at 00:33 US/Eastern, Nick Nicholas wrote: > > > But for goodness' sake, someone bell the cat and ask McIvor or > whoever whether we can legally do this. Then, someone find a > bilingual and do this. And let life move on. I think this approach > much healthier than the toggle, actually: the toggle presupposes > codeswitching, which presupposes bilingualism, and you've said > yourself that ain't gonna happen. I have already said that I have no objection. > >> McIvor is not on the BPFK, is he? Why not invite him? > > Bob expressly wants to invite him. I didn't, and if he is invited, > as far as I'm concerned, he's invited as a Lojbanist (or at the > least, as someone with expertise in Logical Language), not as a > Loglanist. I received an informal invitation to participate, but having read all the correspondence to this point, I see no point in doing so. > > And invite? We haven't gotten that far yet. The current board > statement says the BPFK is open to all comers. (I would prefer it not > be, because it also has to be manageable, but we'll cross that bridge > when we do.) So he's not disinvitable as the statement stands, > really. I do believe I've got the authority to boot people --- and to > be booted; I really don't want it to come to either point... >