From a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Wed Dec 04 17:16:38 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 5 Dec 2002 01:16:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 77728 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2002 01:16:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 5 Dec 2002 01:16:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 Dec 2002 01:16:38 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18Jkd4-0006xi-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 17:16:38 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18Jkd0-0006xR-00; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 17:16:34 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 04 Dec 2002 17:16:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from lmsmtp04.st1.spray.net ([212.78.202.114]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18Jkcv-0006xF-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 17:16:29 -0800 Received: from oemcomputer (host213-121-69-185.surfport24.v21.co.uk [213.121.69.185]) by lmsmtp04.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FB0A47FE0 for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2002 02:15:57 +0100 (MET) To: Subject: [lojban] Re: Loglan Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 01:18:07 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <20021205005537.GL22111@digitalkingdom.org> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Importance: Normal X-archive-position: 3029 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: "And Rosta" Reply-To: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=122260811 X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin Robin: > On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 12:52:06AM -0000, And Rosta wrote: > > Bob McIvor: > > > Most newcomers to TLI have looked at both languages before deciding > > > to go with TLI > > > > I'm curious as to what their reasons were. Do you know? > > > > (I found Loglan (word lists) shortly before Lojban. I never really > > made a conscious choice between them, > > I, on the other hand, did make a concious choice. I was actually > canvassing all sources I could find for a logical language. The > *instant* I discovered that Loglan was copywritten, I dropped it in > favour of lojban Yes, that is a good reason. (I am assuming you mean what I would call "copyrighted" and not "copywritten".) I have never seen a TLI statement of its position on copyright, though. --And.