From phma@webjockey.net Sun Dec 08 03:15:33 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 8 Dec 2002 11:15:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 48228 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2002 11:15:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 8 Dec 2002 11:15:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Dec 2002 11:15:32 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18KzPI-00024c-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sun, 08 Dec 2002 03:15:32 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18KzPE-00024J-00; Sun, 08 Dec 2002 03:15:28 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 08 Dec 2002 03:15:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from 208-150-110-21-adsl.precisionet.net ([208.150.110.21] helo=neofelis.ixazon.lan) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18KzP9-00024A-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 08 Dec 2002 03:15:23 -0800 Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500) id 5E84B3C610; Sun, 8 Dec 2002 06:14:38 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: Subject: [lojban] Re: cmegadri valfendi preti Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 06:14:34 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <5.2.0.9.0.20021206223513.03a4fec0@pop.east.cox.net> <5.1.0.14.0.20021207155737.00aa5b30@pop.east.cox.net> <003b01c29ea9$9f62a920$81c90950@tanj> In-Reply-To: <003b01c29ea9$9f62a920$81c90950@tanj> X-Spamtrap: fesmri@ixazon.dynip.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <02120806143407.19670@neofelis> X-archive-position: 3287 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@webjockey.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: Pierre Abbat Reply-To: phma@webjockey.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=92712300 On Sunday 08 December 2002 06:02, Lionel Vidal wrote: > Very nice! I strongly support the idea to clarify that definition, and > maybe also the whole status of section 16, as "experimental" may be not > appropriate any more. e.g. will a text that uses that "experimental" > feature be declared conformant (not that I really support that kind of > recently proposed classification, but if it is going to be official, I feel > it should answer such questions, or may it has already?) The problem with section 16 is that it cannot be extended to fu'ivla longer than 6 letters which end in CCVVCV, and is very difficult to extend to longer fu'ivla of whatever form. I have a proposal that works for a large class of fu'ivla, including both CCVVCV and all type-3's that end in a single vowel, and have only to code it up and prove it. phma