From thill@xxxxx.xxxx Thu Jan 6 16:18:40 2000
X-Digest-Num: 331
Message-ID: <44114.331.1796.959273825@eGroups.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 17:18:40 -0700 
From: trevor hill <thill@xxxxx.xxxx
Subject: RE: "what i have for dinner"


ahhhhhhhh.... :) thank you, and. This is what I wanted to know.........
so, while you may think this is well known, it's not documented clearly in
the reference grammar, or in the lessons, as far as I know, so ... maybe
something should be done about this...

co'o
mi'e trevyr.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: And Rosta [mailto:a.rosta@pmail.net]
> Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2000 3:42 AM
> To: lojban
> Subject: RE: [lojban] "what i have for dinner"
> 
> 
> Lojbab:
> > The main problem I see with these constructs is that of 
> losing context.
> > 
> > If I say "I know the truth value of broda" and that truth 
> value is "true", 
> > then there is loss of information to say "I know 'true'"/
> 
> Hence this would be {mi djuno le du'u ma kau jei broda} (= le 
> du'u xu kau
> broda) rather than {mi djuno le jei broda}. All this is well-known to
> loi Lojbo.
> 
> --And.
> 
> --------------------------- ONElist Sponsor 
> ----------------------------
> 
> Get great offers on top-notch products that match your interests!
> Sign up for eLerts at:
> <a href=" http://clickme.onelist.com/ad/elerts1 ">Click Here</a>
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> 
> To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com
>