From sbelknap@UIC.EDU Thu Jan 02 09:48:44 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 2 Jan 2003 17:48:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 60510 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2003 04:21:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 2 Jan 2003 04:21:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Jan 2003 04:21:48 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18Twrc-0003Bl-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 01 Jan 2003 20:21:48 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18TwrW-0003BM-00; Wed, 01 Jan 2003 20:21:42 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 01 Jan 2003 20:21:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from birch.cc.uic.edu ([128.248.155.162]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 18TwrQ-0003BA-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 01 Jan 2003 20:21:36 -0800 Received: (qmail 8855 invoked from network); 2 Jan 2003 04:21:30 -0000 Received: from dial0-349.dialin.uic.edu (HELO uic.edu) (128.248.172.166) by birch.cc.uic.edu with SMTP; 2 Jan 2003 04:21:30 -0000 Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 22:21:31 -0600 Subject: [lojban] Re: I am the man who wrote you a letter Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v551) Cc: lojban-list@lojban.org To: noras@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20030101200301.02c52920@pop.east.cox.net> Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.551) X-archive-position: 3682 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: sbelknap@uic.edu Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: Steven Belknap Reply-To: sbelknap@uic.edu X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=810567 On Wednesday, January 1, 2003, at 07:12 PM, Nora LeChevalier wrote: > However, I agree with Robin Turner that "nanmu" would only be used if > that > were important; otherwise, I'd leave it out altogether, getting: > mi du le te xatra be do .i la noras cusku le sapycnici co'o mi'e la stivn