From phma@webjockey.net Sun Jan 19 08:02:56 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 19 Jan 2003 16:02:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 82982 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2003 16:02:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 19 Jan 2003 16:02:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO blackcat.ixazon.lan) (208.150.110.21) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 19 Jan 2003 16:02:55 -0000 Received: by blackcat.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1B5884BBC; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 16:02:58 +0000 (UTC) Organization: dis To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] loi preti be fi lo nincli zo'u tu'e Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 11:02:57 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <200301191529.KAA21247@mail2.reutershealth.com> In-Reply-To: <200301191529.KAA21247@mail2.reutershealth.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200301191102.57642.phma@webjockey.net> From: Pierre Abbat X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=92712300 On Sunday 19 January 2003 10:16, John Cowan wrote: li'o > To the second point, yes; that is how filling any place multiple times > works. (Technically, the implied connective is jo'u, but we have not really > figured out under what circumstances jo'u differs from .e). vi vreta fa lo flapre .e lo stace nanmu: they can be the same person. vi vreta fa lo flapre jo'u lo stace nanmu: they aren't. vi vreta fa lo flapre je ke stace nanmu: they are. phma