From lojban-out@lojban.org Thu Feb 27 17:08:56 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_4); 28 Feb 2003 01:08:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 57597 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2003 01:08:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 28 Feb 2003 01:08:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 Feb 2003 01:08:51 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 18oZ19-0004T7-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 17:08:51 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18oZ12-0004So-00; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 17:08:44 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 27 Feb 2003 17:08:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18oZ0v-0004Sf-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 17:08:37 -0800 Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h1S1F7bE007584 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 19:15:07 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com) Received: (from fracture@localhost) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id h1S1F6dL007583 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 19:15:06 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 19:15:06 -0600 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Any (was: Nick will be with you shortly) Message-ID: <20030228011506.GA7457@allusion.net> References: <20030227145641.F95554-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> <20030227203046.GB6354@allusion.net> <200302272338.28613.phma@webjockey.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200302272338.28613.phma@webjockey.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-archive-position: 4202 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong From: Jordan DeLong Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 11:38:28PM +0100, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Thursday 27 February 2003 21:30, Jordan DeLong wrote: > > But "mi djica lo mikce" is true under different circumstances than > > "mi djica mikce". It's clearer if you translate to english; > > the first: There is a doctor (some doctors) that I need. The > > second: I need any doctor(s). >=20 > Are you trying to say "n'importe quel"? I think the way to say this is "l= o =20 > mikce", where "" is some discursive in UI, though I'm not sure which. That was xod's argument. "lo da'icu'i mikce", etc. However this still doesn't solve the problem. "lo mikce" has to be the same as "da poi mikce". "I need some doctor" or "There is a doctor that I need". It cannot do "I need any doctor". --=20 Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u sei la mark. tuen. cusku --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+XrgaDrrilS51AZ8RAh1zAKDJaqxbSp7Yaz8JDPFZa2PjQzTYswCfbvSK XitccjTBQUA5LEUI1xakK5E= =g2R8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+--