From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Mar 11 11:27:38 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_1); 11 Mar 2003 19:27:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 10295 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2003 19:27:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 11 Mar 2003 19:27:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Mar 2003 19:27:36 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 18spPU-0003Er-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 11:27:36 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18spPP-0003EW-00; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 11:27:31 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 11 Mar 2003 11:27:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 18spPI-0003EM-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 11:27:24 -0800 Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 11:27:24 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: [lojban.org #92] Re: Your lujvo records in Jbovlaste Message-ID: <20030311192724.GP5580@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20030311184941.GI5580@digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i X-archive-position: 4436 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 02:00:26PM -0500, Craig wrote: > >> > >The lujvo definitions you are making in Jbovlaste are not according > >> > >to standard. > >> > > > >> > >See http://www.lojban.org/jbovlaste/help/definitions.html > >> > > > >> > >The short version is that instead of x1, x2, etc., one uses place > >> > >designators on the basis of the first letter(s) of the constituent > >> > >gismu/cmavo. > >> > > >> > That standard doesn't work. You have no way of telling which order > >> > the arguments are in the lujvo. You can't just assume order of > >> > appearance, because sometimes the definition needs to have them in a > >> > different order than the lujvo. > > >Umm, where did you get all that text that you're replying to? I'd like > >to be in on whatever discussion that was. > > Oddly, I didn't even get the reply you were replying to. No, you didn't. 8) In came in to the request tracker. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi