From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Tue Apr 22 10:13:05 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_5); 22 Apr 2003 17:13:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 18726 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2003 17:13:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 22 Apr 2003 17:13:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Apr 2003 17:13:04 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 1981KK-0006S9-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 10:13:04 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1981K9-0006Ro-00; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 10:12:53 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 22 Apr 2003 10:12:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web20509.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.226.144]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1981K2-0006Rf-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 10:12:46 -0700 Message-ID: <20030422171244.6892.qmail@web20509.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.49.74.2] by web20509.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 10:12:44 PDT Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 10:12:44 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [lojban] Re: mi'e To: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <3EA588D8.29915.1B8B1B1@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 4890 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: Jorge "Llambías" Reply-To: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=142311107 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 la filip cusku di'e > .i ku'i zoi zoi nantcoso zoi na lojbo valsi ki'u le nu no lojbo valsi > cu se nenri ny. ce'o ty. ce'o cy. i oi drani > ni'o do zmanei zo bertcoso .i ku'i bo cumki fa le nu finti lo lujvo fo > lo fu'ivla .i .y. .y. i cumki i ku'i na zabna lujvo > My Lojban fails me, but what I'm trying to say is that while you are > free to prefer words of the form "nanytcoso", you cannot give as a > reason for the preference that it is not possible to form lujvo from > fu'ivla and that therefore, cultural gismu are required in order to > form convenient lujvo. Yes, I tend to forget that zei-lujvo are lujvo too. But I wouldn't call them _convenient_ lujvo, as they are rather kludgey. I prefer all cultures be treated the same way as far as possible. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo http://search.yahoo.com