From Pycyn@aol.com Mon Feb 7 02:24:22 2000 X-Digest-Num: 356 Message-ID: <44114.356.1949.959273826@eGroups.com> Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2000 05:24:22 EST From: Pycyn@aol.com Subject: Re: Subjunctive? To CDW missing the subjunctive, it is not so much that lojbanists have gone off on other tangents (though we have and always do) it is that subjunctives (in this case mainly contrary-to-fact) turn out to be, in Lojban, not much to do with either "if" or things that look like tenses, and if you have your eye on those factors, the discussion of how to deal with English subjunctives may well have slid by. pc