From BestATN@aol.com Mon Feb 21 19:56:40 2000 X-Digest-Num: 371 Message-ID: <44114.371.2057.959273826@eGroups.com> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 22:56:40 EST From: BestATN@aol.com Subject: Re: Digest Number 370 In a message dated 2/21/2000 5:27:54 AM Eastern Standard Time, lojban@onelist.com writes: > can {kanro} be used for machines? > > Well, computers can have viruses, so why not? they are viruses in natlang, but of course a person can't get catch a computer virus the way he can a cold virus. is kanro really that broadly defined? Steven Lytle