From grey.havens@earthling.net Mon May 08 15:03:38 2000 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6103 invoked from network); 8 May 2000 22:02:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m2.onelist.org with QMQP; 8 May 2000 22:02:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO postfix1.free.fr) (212.27.32.21) by mta3 with SMTP; 8 May 2000 22:02:34 -0000 Received: from tam.n (unknown [213.228.59.143]) by postfix1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A327282EE; Tue, 9 May 2000 00:02:31 +0200 (MEST) Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 00:02:06 +0200 (CEST) X-Sender: elrond@tam.n To: Brook Conner Cc: lojban@egroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Lojbanizing my (nick)name In-Reply-To: <3916E447.CE1C2AB@concentric.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Elrond > lo nu cadzu cu pluka la maks. gerku > > So does the "la" extend to cover the "gerku"? I would have said /le la maks. gerku/, which means /the dog related to "la maks."/, which cannot be misunderstood if you make your story clear. Am I right ? raph