From rob@twcny.rr.com Fri Jul 07 21:54:43 2000
Return-Path:
Received: (qmail 29401 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2000 04:54:42 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m4.onelist.org with QMQP; 8 Jul 2000 04:54:42 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO telenet.net) (204.97.152.225) by mta1 with SMTP; 8 Jul 2000 04:54:42 -0000
Received: from les27 (dialup88-106.telenet.net [208.20.88.106]) by telenet.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id AAA14550 for ; Sat, 8 Jul 2000 00:54:40 -0400
Message-ID: <010701bfe898$95cd5c80$5408fd80@resnet.cornell.edu>
To:
References:
Subject: Re: [lojban] 2 maths questions
Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2000 00:54:22 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
From: "Rob Speer"
John Cowan wrote:
> What I don't know is whether this notion of "thickness" can be
> extrapolated beyond the sets which are multiples of some integer.
> How "thick" is the set of primes relative to the set of integers,
> for example?
me'o de'o ny. jibni leni denmi be lei ralnamcu poi jibni me'o ny.
The density of the prime numbers near n is approximately log(n).
--
I'm surprised there isn't already a lujvo for "prime number". How about:
ralnamcu (ralju+namcu) x1 is a prime number of mathematical field x2 by
convention x3
--
Rob Speer