From ljm@xxxx.xxx.xxxxxx.xxxx Mon Feb 22 08:29:24 1999 X-Digest-Num: 71 Message-ID: <44114.71.396.959273824@eGroups.com> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 00:29:24 +0800 From: Lin Zhemin Not following this thread closely, but I haven't seen anyone mention that > we have dadjo as a gismu pertaining to the Tao (without defining it). There was someone mentioned it. But according to the ancient (:Q) gismu.lst, it is defined as "Tao of Taoism; culture/nation/religion ac" Maybe the definition can be changed to "Dao(Tao), as the description of Daodejing written by Laozi, the word itself is w/o definition", but the former one is not suitable, since one may be confused w/ religious Taoism. So {zo dao.} would be better, IMHO, if nothing is gonna change. If dadjo is redefined to the second one, then we can surely use something like {dajkralijda} to indicate the religious Taoism. -- .e'osai ko sarji la lojban. ==> 請支持邏輯語言。 co'o mi'e lindjy,min. ==> 再見,我是林哲民。 Fingerprint20 = CE32 D237 02C0 FE31 FEA9 B858 DE8F AE2D D810 F2D9