From taral@taral.net Sat Sep 02 00:59:32 2000 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19218 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2000 07:59:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m2.onelist.org with QMQP; 2 Sep 2000 07:59:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.taral.net) (128.83.221.146) by mta2 with SMTP; 2 Sep 2000 07:59:31 -0000 Received: by mail.taral.net (Postfix, from userid 500) id 40A7126333; Sat, 2 Sep 2000 02:59:30 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2000 02:59:27 -0500 (CDT) Subject: samselpla vs. samjva To: lojban@egroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; BOUNDARY="8323328-1804289383-967881570=:19925" Message-Id: <20000902075930.40A7126333@mail.taral.net> From: Taral --8323328-1804289383-967881570=:19925 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Since lujvo aren't standardized, I'd like to suggest a change from "samselpla" to "samjva". I tend to view "samselpla" (computer type-of plan) as "computer architecture", whereas "samjva" (computer type-of rule(s)) really echoes my idea of what a "computer program" is. Comments? -- Taral Please use PGP/GPG to send me mail. --8323328-1804289383-967881570=:19925 Content-Type: APPLICATION/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.1.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEABECAAYFAjmws2IACgkQ7rh4CE+nYEllnACfeREoisy32L/b+vosAlvj5EYX ifMAoNXPE8F/nAnGx+nLJgaqQMtofUIw =+M29 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8323328-1804289383-967881570=:19925--