From taral@taral.net Sat Sep 23 22:45:39 2000 Return-Path: X-Sender: taral@taral.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-6_0_2); 24 Sep 2000 05:45:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 27047 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2000 05:45:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m3.onelist.org with QMQP; 24 Sep 2000 05:45:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.taral.net) (128.83.154.130) by mta3 with SMTP; 24 Sep 2000 05:45:37 -0000 Received: by mail.taral.net (Postfix, from userid 500) id D088426333; Sun, 24 Sep 2000 00:45:35 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 00:45:33 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: [lojban] pe:ne::po:? To: Lojban list In-Reply-To: <0009232236111G.00920@neofelis> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; BOUNDARY="8323328-1804289383-969774335=:20725" Message-Id: <20000924054535.D088426333@mail.taral.net> From: Taral --8323328-1804289383-969774335=:20725 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii On 23 Sep, Pierre Abbat wrote: > > We have "pe" and "ne", the first being restrictive, the second incidental. > Similarly "poi" and "noi". Now if I do the same thing to "po", I get "no", but > that means zero. So how do you express incidental possession? There's a bit in the Book on this... let me see... pages 174-5 deal with it... I can't find it right now. Oh, well. -- Taral Please use PGP/GPG to send me mail. --8323328-1804289383-969774335=:20725 Content-Type: APPLICATION/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.1.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEABECAAYFAjnNlP8ACgkQ7rh4CE+nYElzwgCgxGo1o4yC/u0vpWly2nS37oG8 tx8Anik1k/dW7wpTPEZLk0ZtDXgrNHCe =y7Bb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8323328-1804289383-969774335=:20725--