From b.gohla@gmx.de Tue Oct 31 08:24:07 2000 Return-Path: X-Sender: b.gohla@gmx.de X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-6_2_1); 31 Oct 2000 16:24:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 6690 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2000 16:24:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m3.onelist.org with QMQP; 31 Oct 2000 16:24:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.gmx.net) (194.221.183.20) by mta1 with SMTP; 31 Oct 2000 16:24:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 11367 invoked by uid 0); 31 Oct 2000 16:24:02 -0000 Received: from a921e.pppool.de (HELO linux) (213.6.146.30) by mail.gmx.net with SMTP; 31 Oct 2000 16:24:02 -0000 Reply-To: b.gohla@gmx.de Organization: private site To: lojban@egroups.com Subject: re: calendrical names Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 17:23:40 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29.2] Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <00103117331700.01180@linux> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Bjoern Gohla coi rodo to go this path of arbitraryness ad absurdum, why not state dates in terms of seconds counting from the Big Bang. after all the second is the SI base unit for time and thus most culturally neutral, furthermore the universe is about the most universal frame of reference one can have (BTW is this a tautology). co'omi'e .biorn.