From Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de Fri Nov 17 09:16:49 2000 Return-Path: X-Sender: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-6_2_1); 17 Nov 2000 17:16:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 96622 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2000 17:16:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 17 Nov 2000 17:16:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hj.egroups.com) (10.1.10.42) by mta1 with SMTP; 17 Nov 2000 17:16:48 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de Received: from [10.1.10.103] by hj.egroups.com with NNFMP; 17 Nov 2000 17:16:47 -0000 Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 17:16:41 -0000 To: lojban@egroups.com Subject: Re: except the cat Message-ID: <8v3p5p+9h33@eGroups.com> In-Reply-To: <0011161859490Z.20128@neofelis> User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Length: 907 X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster X-Originating-IP: 193.149.49.79 From: "=?iso-8859-1?q?Alfred_W._Tueting_(T=FCting)?=" --- In lojban@egroups.com, Pierre Abbat wrote: > Finally figured it out: >=20 > roda ku'anai le mlatu I'm not at all sure about that: 1) {ku'a} needs arguments of type "set" - "le mlatu" isn't a set, nor is "roda" 2) {ku'a} designates the "intersection" of different sets: how can "roda" have an intersection with "another" set, since *including*=20 all types of sets? 3) What has {ku'anai} the power to express just by negating an intersection? As far I understand the use of {ku'a}, it is e.g.: lo'i (ro) mi pendo ku'a lo'i mlatu cu la cmacrib. .aulun. ________ Eml=E9kezet!=20=20 Te =F6sszet=F6rt haj=F3nk egy deszkasz=E1la,=20 Mit a hull=E1m s a sz=E9l visz=E1lya A tengerpartra vet... -- doi se morji po'u pa stali tanbo=20 po'e lei mi'o bloti selpo'i ge'u poi se renro=20 fi le xamsi rajma'a le terbradi be loi=20 djacu .e lo brife=20 (le la pEtefi.candor. pemci se fanva zoi gy A.W.T. gy la lojban.)