From rob@twcny.rr.com Tue Dec 12 13:50:30 2000 Return-Path: X-Sender: rob@twcny.rr.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@egroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-6_3_1_3); 12 Dec 2000 21:50:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 57244 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2000 21:50:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 12 Dec 2000 21:50:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailout1-1.nyroc.rr.com) (24.92.226.146) by mta1 with SMTP; 12 Dec 2000 21:50:26 -0000 Received: from mail1.twcny.rr.com (mail1-0 [24.92.226.74]) by mailout1-1.nyroc.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA17980 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 16:46:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from riff ([24.161.104.50]) by mail1.twcny.rr.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-59787U250000L250000S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 16:46:08 -0500 Received: from rob by riff with local (Exim 3.20 #1 (Debian)) id 145xJC-0000nE-00 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2000 16:50:02 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 16:50:02 -0500 To: lojban@egroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] fu'ivla tarmi Message-ID: <20001212165002.B2817@twcny.rr.com> Reply-To: rob@twcny.rr.com References: <00121211423801.09168@neofelis> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <00121211423801.09168@neofelis>; from phma@oltronics.net on Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 11:32:00AM -0500 X-Is-It-Not-Nifty: www.sluggy.com From: Rob Speer On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 11:32:00AM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote: > CVC/CVCV: yes Is that really possible? That breaks apart into a gismu form (CVC/CV) and a cmavo form (CV). Is that allowable provided that the CVC/CV part isn't a gismu? -- la rabspir.