From xod@sixgirls.org Sat Feb 03 14:57:37 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: xod@erika.sixgirls.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_2_1); 3 Feb 2001 22:57:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 51524 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2001 22:57:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 3 Feb 2001 22:57:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO erika.sixgirls.org) (209.208.150.50) by mta2 with SMTP; 3 Feb 2001 22:57:16 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by erika.sixgirls.org (8.11.2/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f13MvFV02169 for ; Sat, 3 Feb 2001 17:57:15 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 17:57:14 -0500 (EST) To: Subject: Re: [lojban] su'u In-Reply-To: <20010203174354.F24920@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Invent Yourself On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > So you're saying that 'do catlu be le nu mi klama' is _not_ ambiguous as > the grammar stands, and that 'le nu {sumti}' is illegal to make sure > that it's not ambiguous? Is there an alternate explanation I'm not seeing? ----- We do not like And if a cat those Rs and Ds, needed a hat? Who can't resist Free enterprise more subsidies. is there for that!