From Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de Thu Apr 12 11:09:43 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_1); 12 Apr 2001 18:09:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 76562 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2001 18:09:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 12 Apr 2001 18:09:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mw.egroups.com) (10.1.2.2) by mta1 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2001 18:09:41 -0000 X-eGroups-Return: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de Received: from [10.1.4.69] by mw.egroups.com with NNFMP; 12 Apr 2001 18:09:40 -0000 Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 18:09:40 -0000 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: FA tagging Message-ID: <9b4r14+crv4@eGroups.com> User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Length: 518 X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster X-Originating-IP: 193.149.49.79 From: "A.W.T." I recently became aware of something IMO not explicitely described in the Book: Is it allowed to say {mi dunda do fe levi rozgu} and what does it mean? Is it equivalent to {mi dunda levi rozgu do}? In other words: can a selbri place already occupied by a sumti *by word order* be dis-placed by a *following* tagged sumti? (I'd tend for this!) Or, could this mean that this tagging causes the place being occupied by two (or more) sumti (like in {fa mi fa do klama fe le zarci fe le zdani etc.})? co'o mi'e .aulun.