From jjllambias@hotmail.com Sat Apr 21 13:38:33 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@onelist.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_2); 21 Apr 2001 20:38:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 98390 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2001 20:38:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 21 Apr 2001 20:38:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.240.155) by mta1 with SMTP; 21 Apr 2001 20:38:32 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sat, 21 Apr 2001 13:38:32 -0700 Received: from 200.41.247.53 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sat, 21 Apr 2001 20:38:31 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.41.247.53] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Three more issues Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 20:38:31 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Apr 2001 20:38:32.0090 (UTC) FILETIME=[07834FA0:01C0CAA3] From: "Jorge Llambias" la aulun cusku di'e >Oh, BTW, how's the phrase "You should have...", "I should have..." be >expressed in Lojban - as {.ei mi pu ...} can't work? Why does it not work? Admittedly it is ambiguous between "I had to" and "I should have", but if anything it is closer to the latter because the obligation {ei} is in the present. co'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.