From cmeclax@ixazon.dynip.com Sat Apr 28 22:20:17 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: cmeclax@ixazon.dynip.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_2); 29 Apr 2001 05:20:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 25408 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2001 05:20:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 29 Apr 2001 05:20:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (207.15.133.35) by mta3 with SMTP; 29 Apr 2001 05:19:59 -0000 Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 504) id 635633C56C; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 01:19:33 -0400 (EDT) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Change Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 01:15:55 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29.2] Content-Type: text/plain References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01042901193203.02204@neofelis> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: cmeclax po'u le cmevi'u ke'umri -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 de'i Sat, 28 Apr 2001 la xorxes cusku di'e > i la frog galfi le te mifra lo drata te mifra That would mean that he changed Blowfish to Rijndael, for instance. I'm talking about changing keys, using the same cipher. The closest gismu I've found to what I mean is stika, but the third place doesn't make sense here. cmeclax -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE666RkuUUxQ/DrwssRAhObAKCMNmotHvqu8YtZyj/alNhkz9Kl2gCfdOGy s92iciMlXYHobyiGJAHdSeg= =s9Xm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----